you already had it the last time ;)

I've been thinking about it after all. I selected the users who participated in the tests of the application (NWChem long) and the chaotic versions of NWchem (normal queue) and add the beta badge.

select distinct result.userid, user.name from result,user where (app_version_num=16 or app_version_num=15 or app_version_num=14 or app_version_num=12 or appid=3) and result.userid=user.id; 
+--------+------------------------------+
| userid | name                         |
+--------+------------------------------+

Now 67.

I'll launch a re-validate on all WU.

I have 42 wus pending for validation...

Have you checked to see if they are still waiting for another computer to complete the WU ?
These tasks are minimum quorum 2 now.

You're right, for lack of time, I jumped to the conclusion very quickly. I exchanged courteous e-mails with the user. I always give the benefit of the doubt and in this case the truth is more subtle. His intention was not to cheat on credits, but to store a lot of work units.

Yesterday, I had to suspend an account for two weeks and remove credits, for obvious credit cheating. I'm quite annoyed that instead of doing science, I have to deal with this kind of behavior. We're small and we're short on time and it doesn't help scientific research...

If you increase the task length how will we know for sure if its just another long running molecule that needs aborting or it really is a long task that will complete and score cobblestones?

Up to now.

Thank you for giving your choices and opinions under this post.

Why not focus on the Linux app that works great and focus all of your attention on the science???

Yes, QCP added these to your Preferences.

Now that they added the Max # jobs & Max # CPUs options we need to know what you selected.