My recent credit is 1998.87. Why I am not in the credits list?
Tullio

---

OK, I am listed again as number 40. Not bad for an Intel i5 9400F running the home edition of Windows 10 and VirtualBox and an old Linux laptop with AMD E-450 and SuSE Leap 15.0.
Tullio

---

I am running also nwchem on a Linux Virtual machine with SuSE Tumbleweed and kernel 5.10.12-1 which the Suse development version. But since it is enlisted in Science United its credits go to Science United, which has rank number 5 in the ranking list.So I don't know my contribution.. I have done so far 226 tasks on this Virtual Machine.
Tullio

---

Today you did not receive a lot of crédit because a lot of tasks are not concluding same with windows
Don't worry. It could be spécific to the tasks we are running
But the system is a little more stable as at end of december

Yet I am number 37 in the ranking list with 2 PCs, one very average with Windows and one old and slow in Linux, plus a Linux Virtual Machine running on an AMD Ryzen 5 1400 CPU, my fastest CPU which does not give me any credit since it is enlisted in Science United. I am rather astonished by the i5 9400F CPU with only 6 processors which runs Windows 10.
Tullio

---

I have two funny results on tasks completed and validated. Task 2313002 has a running time of 662,00 s and a CPU time of 3972,00 s. Idem for task 2112787.
Tullio

---

It 's curious :

your two tasks , validated by the system , appear to be a multicore work unit (precisely 6 cores).

6010639 2313002 12 Feb 2021, 0:55:46 UTC 12 Feb 2021, 1:06:48 UTC Terminé et validé 662.00 3,972.00 200.00 NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64

6010936 2312787 12 Feb 2021, 0:55:46 UTC 12 Feb 2021, 1:06:48 UTC Terminé et validé 662.00 3,972.00 200.00 NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64

662 * 6 = 3972 seconds whereas the work unit is listed as a single core app :vbox64_t1

For windows hosts , there is no multi-cores work unit in this project.

My Intel i5 9400F CPU is listed as 6 processors, meaning it has three cores.
Tullio

---

I've noticed that most of the Linux hosts that are faster than my Windows 10 PC using Virtual Box have a small number of processors, while those with a high number of processors are often slower. Do they lack enough memory? My Intel i5 9400F CPU has only six processors and 12 GB RAM.
Tullio

---

I've noticed that most of the Linux hosts that are faster than my Windows 10 PC using Virtual Box have a small number of processors, while those with a high number of processors are often slower.

Are they running the single-core work units? The difference is because the smaller ones (e.g., four cores) use full cores. That is what the gamers like to support their GPUs.
The larger ones (8 or more) are usually the virtual cores, that is twice the full cores. They are slower per core, but you get more output due to having more cores.