Host ID 1388 corrupted

Message boards : Number crunching : Host ID 1388 corrupted
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 4 · 5 · 6 · 7

AuthorMessage
swiftmallard
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Oct 19
Posts: 87
Credit: 6,026,455
RAC: 0
Message 1523 - Posted: 23 Oct 2021, 2:42:45 UTC - in response to Message 1447.  

ID: 1523 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
PDW

Send message
Joined: 3 Oct 19
Posts: 43
Credit: 40,548,179
RAC: 0
Message 1535 - Posted: 6 Nov 2021, 15:08:41 UTC - in response to Message 1523.  

ID: 1535 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
PDW

Send message
Joined: 3 Oct 19
Posts: 43
Credit: 40,548,179
RAC: 0
Message 1536 - Posted: 7 Nov 2021, 8:05:50 UTC - in response to Message 1535.  
Last modified: 7 Nov 2021, 8:07:58 UTC

ID: 1536 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
PDW

Send message
Joined: 3 Oct 19
Posts: 43
Credit: 40,548,179
RAC: 0
Message 1537 - Posted: 7 Nov 2021, 10:03:04 UTC - in response to Message 1536.  

ID: 1537 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Tullio

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 20
Posts: 103
Credit: 2,142,600
RAC: 0
Message 1538 - Posted: 7 Nov 2021, 17:26:12 UTC

VirtualBox?
Tullio
ID: 1538 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
PDW

Send message
Joined: 3 Oct 19
Posts: 43
Credit: 40,548,179
RAC: 0
Message 1539 - Posted: 7 Nov 2021, 20:15:52 UTC - in response to Message 1537.  

ID: 1539 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
PHILIPPE

Send message
Joined: 4 Jan 20
Posts: 60
Credit: 516,736
RAC: 0
Message 1540 - Posted: 7 Nov 2021, 20:21:32 UTC - in response to Message 1538.  

I sent a private message to raddoc , advising him to downgrade virtualbox to 5.2.xx version , in order to see if a change in the behavior of the work units occurs.
But he didn't answer for the moment.
ID: 1540 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Tullio

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 20
Posts: 103
Credit: 2,142,600
RAC: 0
Message 1541 - Posted: 8 Nov 2021, 5:22:57 UTC

I am using VBox 6.1.28, with good results.
Tullio
ID: 1541 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
PHILIPPE

Send message
Joined: 4 Jan 20
Posts: 60
Credit: 516,736
RAC: 0
Message 1542 - Posted: 8 Nov 2021, 17:04:28 UTC - in response to Message 1541.  

It depends on the hardware , i suppose.
I have no good results with my host with 6.xx.xx. virtualbox version.
It is curious but this is the truth.
This is why i advised him to try this change and downgrade .So , he may see the difference and would probably obtain more good results.
It is just a piece of advice , if he wants to earn some credits with this project (gridcoin is his team).
ID: 1542 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Tullio

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 20
Posts: 103
Credit: 2,142,600
RAC: 0
Message 1543 - Posted: 9 Nov 2021, 5:59:16 UTC

My CPU is an Intel i5 9400F with 6 processors. Windows is now Windows 11.
Tulllio
ID: 1543 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
PHILIPPE

Send message
Joined: 4 Jan 20
Posts: 60
Credit: 516,736
RAC: 0
Message 1562 - Posted: 15 Nov 2021, 17:11:04 UTC - in response to Message 1543.  

Apparently , raddoc has tested my advice and we can see a difference in the behavior of the results :

8890967 2952723 11 Nov 2021, 9:51:58 UTC 11 Nov 2021, 14:52:18 UTC Terminé, validation peu concluante 7,270.51 7,192.05 en attente NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64
7906645 2956407 11 Nov 2021, 8:57:38 UTC 11 Nov 2021, 11:40:59 UTC Terminé et validé 8,202.08 8,147.63 200.00 NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64
8889936 2934152 11 Nov 2021, 4:31:50 UTC 11 Nov 2021, 8:27:17 UTC Terminé, validation peu concluante 10,646.94 10,542.44 en attente NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64
8889777 2926898 11 Nov 2021, 4:07:07 UTC 11 Nov 2021, 6:04:49 UTC Terminé, validation impossible 6,603.96 6,537.44 0.00 NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64
8888337 2948028 10 Nov 2021, 20:22:01 UTC 11 Nov 2021, 0:54:47 UTC Terminé, validation impossible 11,975.55 11,861.69 0.00 NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64
7905432 2955804 10 Nov 2021, 18:17:38 UTC 10 Nov 2021, 22:00:34 UTC Terminé, validation peu concluante 11,916.89 11,844.69 en attente NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64
7904763 2955471 10 Nov 2021, 12:23:24 UTC 25 Nov 2021, 12:23:24 UTC En cours --- --- --- NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64
7904766 2955473 10 Nov 2021, 5:59:57 UTC 10 Nov 2021, 8:00:39 UTC Terminé, en attente de validation 3,945.93 3,885.19 en attente NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64
8888365 2931689 10 Nov 2021, 0:02:07 UTC 10 Nov 2021, 5:59:57 UTC Valider l'erreur 37.28 0.00 --- NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64
7901444 2953816 8 Nov 2021, 19:49:01 UTC 8 Nov 2021, 19:52:39 UTC Erreur lors des calculs 12.92 0.00 --- NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64
8885033 2950921 8 Nov 2021, 17:51:33 UTC 8 Nov 2021, 18:56:03 UTC Erreur lors des calculs 16.23 0.00 --- NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64
7901441 2953814 8 Nov 2021, 16:55:37 UTC 8 Nov 2021, 17:36:05 UTC Erreur lors des calculs 16.08 0.00 --- NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64
8884521 2951873 8 Nov 2021, 15:44:44 UTC 8 Nov 2021, 15:55:55 UTC Erreur lors des calculs 15.17 0.00 --- NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64
7901211 2953699 8 Nov 2021, 15:24:06 UTC 8 Nov 2021, 15:44:43 UTC Erreur lors des calculs 16.18 0.00 --- NWChem v0.11 (vbox64_t1)
windows_x86_64


From 6.0.14 ,He downgraded to 5.2.38 and a real change appeared.
He has an amd ryzen processor :AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
Mine is an amd a10.
So maybe the amd processors are more sensible than the intel processors for this project.
ID: 1562 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
xii5ku

Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 20
Posts: 24
Credit: 68,559,000
RAC: 0
Message 1645 - Posted: 5 Feb 2022, 9:33:56 UTC
Last modified: 5 Feb 2022, 9:34:12 UTC

9800 — Debian 11, BOINC version 7.16.16, anonymous owner
ID: 1645 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
xii5ku

Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 20
Posts: 24
Credit: 68,559,000
RAC: 0
Message 1646 - Posted: 5 Feb 2022, 10:28:42 UTC
Last modified: 5 Feb 2022, 11:27:10 UTC

@damotbe,
perhaps post into the News feed ( = create a boinc notice) that Linux users who use a 3rd party boinc-client package are asked to check whether they produce any valid results at QuChemPedIA at all. If not, they should revert to their distribution's stock boinc-client package.

Edit:
10053 — Debian 11, BOINC version 7.16.16, anonymous owner

8589 — Windows+vbox, 100% error rate, @raddoc
ID: 1646 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
xii5ku

Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 20
Posts: 24
Credit: 68,559,000
RAC: 0
Message 1647 - Posted: 5 Feb 2022, 11:56:34 UTC

9890 — Ubuntu 18.04.5, BOINC version 7.16.16, anonymous owner, currently not requesting work
9904 — Debian 11, BOINC version 7.16.16, anonymous owner, currently not requesting work
10176 — Debian Sid, BOINC version 7.18.1, anonymous owner, currently not requesting work

9617 — Windows+vbox, 100% error rate, @TribbleRED (PM sent)

Anyway; workunits generally succeed eventually even if some of their tasks go through such fast failing hosts, thanks to the workunit configuration of "max # of error/total/success tasks" = 8, 10, 6.
ID: 1647 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 4 · 5 · 6 · 7

Message boards : Number crunching : Host ID 1388 corrupted

©2024 Benoit DA MOTA - LERIA, University of Angers, France